{"id":5651,"date":"2025-11-14T16:31:29","date_gmt":"2025-11-14T16:31:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/staging-appealscentre-eu.ams.stackstaging.com\/case-studies\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci"},"modified":"2026-01-30T16:48:28","modified_gmt":"2026-01-30T16:48:28","slug":"decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci","status":"publish","type":"case-study","link":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/case-studies\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\/","title":{"rendered":"Decyzja platformy uniewa\u017cniona na podstawie jej warto\u015bci"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">U\u017cytkownik z Francji zg\u0142osi\u0142 nam sp\u00f3r, w kt\u00f3rym domaga\u0142 si\u0119 usuni\u0119cia postu z Facebooka. Post twierdzi\u0142, \u017ce osoby, kt\u00f3re nie identyfikuj\u0105 si\u0119 jednoznacznie jako m\u0119\u017cczyzna lub kobieta, powinny skonsultowa\u0107 si\u0119 z psychiatr\u0105. Meta przeanalizowa\u0142a post, nie stwierdzi\u0142a \u017cadnych narusze\u0144 i nie usun\u0119\u0142a go. Jednak po dokonaniu oceny tre\u015bci uchylili\u015bmy t\u0119 decyzj\u0119 i zalecili\u015bmy usuni\u0119cie tre\u015bci. Nasza decyzja odzwierciedla\u0142a stanowisko firmy Meta wobec szkodliwych stereotyp\u00f3w, jak okre\u015blono w uzasadnieniu polityki dotycz\u0105cej nienawistnego zachowania, oraz zasady firmy dotycz\u0105ce g\u0142osu, godno\u015bci i bezpiecze\u0144stwa.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>U\u017cytkownik z Francji zg\u0142osi\u0142 nam sp\u00f3r, w kt\u00f3rym domaga\u0142 si\u0119 usuni\u0119cia postu z Facebooka. Post twierdzi\u0142, \u017ce osoby, kt\u00f3re nie identyfikuj\u0105 si\u0119 jednoznacznie jako m\u0119\u017cczyzna lub kobieta, powinny skonsultowa\u0107 si\u0119 z psychiatr\u0105. Meta przeanalizowa\u0142a post, nie stwierdzi\u0142a \u017cadnych narusze\u0144 i nie usun\u0119\u0142a go. Jednak po dokonaniu oceny tre\u015bci uchylili\u015bmy t\u0119 decyzj\u0119 i zalecili\u015bmy usuni\u0119cie tre\u015bci. &hellip; <a class=\"text-accent mt-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/case-studies\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\/\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":5652,"template":"","class_list":["post-5651","case-study","type-case-study","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.2 (Yoast SEO v28.2) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Decyzja platformy uniewa\u017cniona na podstawie jej warto\u015bci - Appeals Centre Europe<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"pl_PL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Decyzja platformy uniewa\u017cniona na podstawie jej warto\u015bci\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"U\u017cytkownik z Francji zg\u0142osi\u0142 nam sp\u00f3r, w kt\u00f3rym domaga\u0142 si\u0119 usuni\u0119cia postu z Facebooka. Post twierdzi\u0142, \u017ce osoby, kt\u00f3re nie identyfikuj\u0105 si\u0119 jednoznacznie jako m\u0119\u017cczyzna lub kobieta, powinny skonsultowa\u0107 si\u0119 z psychiatr\u0105. Meta przeanalizowa\u0142a post, nie stwierdzi\u0142a \u017cadnych narusze\u0144 i nie usun\u0119\u0142a go. Jednak po dokonaniu oceny tre\u015bci uchylili\u015bmy t\u0119 decyzj\u0119 i zalecili\u015bmy usuni\u0119cie tre\u015bci. &hellip; Read More\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/case-studies\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Appeals Centre Europe\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/appealscentre\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-30T16:48:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/appealscentre.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/image-51.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"581\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"291\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@AppealsCentre\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Szacowany czas czytania\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minuta\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.appealscentre.eu\\\/pl\\\/case-studies\\\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.appealscentre.eu\\\/pl\\\/case-studies\\\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\\\/\",\"name\":\"Decyzja platformy uniewa\u017cniona na podstawie jej warto\u015bci - Appeals Centre Europe\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/appealscentre.eu\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.appealscentre.eu\\\/pl\\\/case-studies\\\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.appealscentre.eu\\\/pl\\\/case-studies\\\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.appealscentre.eu\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/image-51.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-14T16:31:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-30T16:48:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.appealscentre.eu\\\/pl\\\/case-studies\\\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"pl-PL\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.appealscentre.eu\\\/pl\\\/case-studies\\\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pl-PL\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.appealscentre.eu\\\/pl\\\/case-studies\\\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.appealscentre.eu\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/image-51.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.appealscentre.eu\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/image-51.png\",\"width\":581,\"height\":291,\"caption\":\"A crowd of people at a march. A man and a woman are in the centre. The man has coloured face paint on his cheek and the woman has grey hair and black glasses.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.appealscentre.eu\\\/pl\\\/case-studies\\\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.appealscentre.eu\\\/pl\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Decyzja platformy uniewa\u017cniona na podstawie jej warto\u015bci\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/appealscentre.eu\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/appealscentre.eu\\\/\",\"name\":\"Appeals Centre Europe\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/appealscentre.eu\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"ACE\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/appealscentre.eu\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"pl-PL\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/appealscentre.eu\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Appeals Centre Europe\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/appealscentre.eu\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pl-PL\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/appealscentre.eu\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.appealscentre.eu\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/logo.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.appealscentre.eu\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/logo.svg\",\"width\":1,\"height\":1,\"caption\":\"Appeals Centre Europe\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/appealscentre.eu\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/appealscentre\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/AppealsCentre\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/appeals_centre\\\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Decyzja platformy uniewa\u017cniona na podstawie jej warto\u015bci - Appeals Centre Europe","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow"},"og_locale":"pl_PL","og_type":"article","og_title":"Decyzja platformy uniewa\u017cniona na podstawie jej warto\u015bci","og_description":"U\u017cytkownik z Francji zg\u0142osi\u0142 nam sp\u00f3r, w kt\u00f3rym domaga\u0142 si\u0119 usuni\u0119cia postu z Facebooka. Post twierdzi\u0142, \u017ce osoby, kt\u00f3re nie identyfikuj\u0105 si\u0119 jednoznacznie jako m\u0119\u017cczyzna lub kobieta, powinny skonsultowa\u0107 si\u0119 z psychiatr\u0105. Meta przeanalizowa\u0142a post, nie stwierdzi\u0142a \u017cadnych narusze\u0144 i nie usun\u0119\u0142a go. Jednak po dokonaniu oceny tre\u015bci uchylili\u015bmy t\u0119 decyzj\u0119 i zalecili\u015bmy usuni\u0119cie tre\u015bci. &hellip; Read More","og_url":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/case-studies\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\/","og_site_name":"Appeals Centre Europe","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/appealscentre\/","article_modified_time":"2026-01-30T16:48:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":581,"height":291,"url":"https:\/\/appealscentre.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/image-51.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@AppealsCentre","twitter_misc":{"Szacowany czas czytania":"1 minuta"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/case-studies\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\/","url":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/case-studies\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\/","name":"Decyzja platformy uniewa\u017cniona na podstawie jej warto\u015bci - Appeals Centre Europe","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/appealscentre.eu\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/case-studies\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/case-studies\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/image-51.png","datePublished":"2025-11-14T16:31:29+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-30T16:48:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/case-studies\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"pl-PL","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/case-studies\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pl-PL","@id":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/case-studies\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/image-51.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/image-51.png","width":581,"height":291,"caption":"A crowd of people at a march. A man and a woman are in the centre. The man has coloured face paint on his cheek and the woman has grey hair and black glasses."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/case-studies\/decyzja-platformy-zostala-uchylona-na-podstawie-jej-wartosci\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Decyzja platformy uniewa\u017cniona na podstawie jej warto\u015bci"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/appealscentre.eu\/#website","url":"https:\/\/appealscentre.eu\/","name":"Appeals Centre Europe","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/appealscentre.eu\/#organization"},"alternateName":"ACE","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/appealscentre.eu\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"pl-PL"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/appealscentre.eu\/#organization","name":"Appeals Centre Europe","url":"https:\/\/appealscentre.eu\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pl-PL","@id":"https:\/\/appealscentre.eu\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/logo.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/logo.svg","width":1,"height":1,"caption":"Appeals Centre Europe"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/appealscentre.eu\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/appealscentre\/","https:\/\/x.com\/AppealsCentre","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/appeals_centre\/"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case-study\/5651","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case-study"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/case-study"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case-study\/5651\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6812,"href":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case-study\/5651\/revisions\/6812"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5652"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.appealscentre.eu\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}