- Facebook has more than 260 million active monthly users in the EU. Every day these users have content removed or their account suspended, or see harmful content that is left up.
- We have been accepting disputes from Facebook since November 2024.
- In our recent Transparency Report, we overturned Facebook’s decisions 54% of the time, where we reviewed the content.
- The top 3 policy areas we received disputes about were:
- Hate Speech and Hateful Policies
- Adult Nudity and Sexual Activity
- Misinformation
14 September 2026 Site Author
FAQs
Frequently asked questions about submitting a Facebook dispute
How do I submit a dispute?
Click ‘Start Dispute’ in the header of this page to dispute a content moderation decision by Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Pinterest, Threads or YouTube.
What kind of content does the Appeals Centre cover?
We currently accept disputes about individual pieces of content which have been removed or left up by Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Pinterest, Threads, Google Maps and YouTube. This includes videos, photos, text posts and comments. We also review decisions by these platforms to suspend or disable a user’s account, as well as removals of a Page or Group (Facebook and Instagram), or Channel (YouTube).
What platforms does the Appeals Centre cover?
We currently accept disputes about content on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Pinterest, Threads, YouTube and Google Maps. We intend to expand to other social media platforms over time.
How do I track my case?
You can manage and track your case through our online case management portal here.
How does the Appeals Centre select its case reviewers?
The Appeals Centre is staffed by full-time, professional case reviewers with experience of applying platforms’ content policies. We also have reviewers with linguistic and subject-matter expertise. The compensation of our case reviewers is not linked to how they decide cases.
User Support Guide
Better understand your rights under the Digital Services Act.
Featured Case Study: Restored Facebook Group
In April 2025, a user from Cyprus submitted a dispute about a Facebook group that had been suspended for supposedly violating Meta’s rules on Restricted Goods and Services. After reviewing content from the group which had been removed, we found that it should have been covered by an exception allowing people to discuss the medical merits of prescription drugs. We communicated our decision to Facebook who then restored the group in question.
Think Social Media Got It Wrong?
We help you fight platform mistakes and reclaim your voice.